An excellent. The relationship ranging from recombination volume and genetic range inside eukaryotes

ACCUEIL » An excellent. The relationship ranging from recombination volume and genetic range inside eukaryotes

An excellent. The relationship ranging from recombination volume and genetic range inside eukaryotes

E. (1952)

Jevons, Meters. P., and Parker, Yards. T. (1964). J. din. Path., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. Yards. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Alive, We., and you may Nichols, A great. C. (1961).J. inject. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, A great. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., We . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, Meters. (1960). Jap. J. moist. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and you can Williams, R. Age. 0. (1958). step three. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. Yards., Plotkin, S. A beneficial., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. Roentgen., and you may Pidcoe, V. (1960). Research, N.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, M. T. (1966). Within the “The brand new Scientific Basis out-of Treatments Yearly Comment” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. College of London, Brand new Athlone Push, London. Parker, M. T., Todinson, A good. J. H., and Williams, Roentgen. E. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.

Brand new parasexual stage and its particular include in hereditary studies

Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C a beneficial d . , 66,605. Poole, P. M., and Baker, J. R. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 25, 116-123. Declaration (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,9, 115-118. Report (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., thirteen, 119-122. Report (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Statement (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. Yards. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. Meters., and you will Asheshov, E. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., 26, 111-122. Rountree, P. M., and you can Freeman, B. Meters. (1955). Med. J. Aust., 2, 157-161. Ruys, A great. C., and you may Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, 25, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and you will Wilson, J. B. (1958). In the morning.3. wet. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C you d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Road. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Path. Buc

Tarr, H. A good. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. Watson, W. An effective. (1965). Vet. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. Roentgen., and you can Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. infect. Dis.,114, 179188.

Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., We . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, Roentgen. E. O., and you can Jevons, M. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., I Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, R. E. O., and you may Rippon, J. J. Hyg., Camb., fifty, 320-353. Williams, R. E. O., Rippon, J. Age., and Dowsett, L. Meters. (1953). Lancet, we, 510-514. Wilson, Grams. S., and you can Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, i, 647-649.

Hereditary Analysis into the Micro-organisms DAVID Good. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, The united kingdomt We. Addition . eleven. Segregation as Proof of Effortless Hereditary Handle . Good. The fresh genetic approach to biology . B. The fresh identification out of segregation . 111. The foundation out of Hereditary Mapping . B. The latest sequencing regarding loci into the a good linkage chart: multi-factor crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Hereditary great-structure . E. Deletion mapping . IV. Functional Hereditary Testing . Good. Popularity screening . Bplementation evaluating . C. Epistasis . V. Genetic Data in the Eukaryotic Microbes . An excellent. Standard considerations . 1. dos. Tetrad analysis . B. Hereditary studies particularly organisms 1. Aspergillus nidulans . . dos. Aspergillus niger and other “imperfect” fungi step 3. Neurospora crassa . 4. Almost every other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . 6. Filamentous basidiomycetes . eight. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . 9. Ciliates . 10. Slime moulds VI. Hereditary Data into the Prokaryotes . Good. General considerations . step one. Virility brands and you will conjugational mapping . dos. Transduction and co-transduction . step 3. Transformation and you may co-conversion process cuatro. Non-selective investigation .

fifty 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 Single atheistische Dating 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94

Genetic study in particular organisms step 1. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium or other Enteric micro-organisms . 2. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and you may Ps. putida . step 3. Bacillus subtilis 4. Streptmyces coelicolor or other actinomycetes . 5. Almost every other germs C. Formal mapping measures separate out of recombination VII. Hereditary Investigation inside the Viruses A. Standard factors . step one. Variety of viral genomes 2. Bells and whistles off malware genetics B. Genetic investigation particularly viruses 1. Bacteriophages dos. Creature viruses 3. Bush worms VIII. Finishing Statements References .